|
Operating
Statistics | Volumes By Test Type
| Customer Convenience | Failure Statistics | Tailpipe Tests - IM240 & Idle
Operating
Statistics
Test Volume Remained Constant In 2006
In 2006, the test volume was nearly identical to the test volume in 2005. There was a slight increase in tests to fulfill the registration renewal requirements and a slight decrease in tests to fulfill the change of ownership requirement. The highest volume station remained West Allis and the lowest volume station remained Burlington.
Operating
Statistics |
2005 |
2006 |
Total Tests |
739,866 |
739,505 |
# of Registration Renewal Tests |
594,194 |
602,103 |
# of Change of Ownership Tests |
142,960 |
135,398 |
Highest Volume Station |
West Allis
93,098 |
West Allis
94,855 |
Lowest Volume Station |
Burlington
22,992 |
Burlington
22,809 |
Test
Station Activity - Total Volume
West Allis remained the highest volume station in 2006. The station benefited by its proximity the Milwaukee Central inspection station that was impacted throughout the year by the Marquette Interchange construction that is near the inspection station. The West Allis testing facility is the closest alternate testing station to the Milwaukee Central facility. Burlington, one of the smaller stations (2 lanes), conducted the fewest tests for both 2005 and 2006.
Test
Station Throughput – Tests Per Lanes
Throughput refers to the average annual test volume per available lane. This rate permits comparison of the test volume handled at each test station by adjusting for the facility size. In 2006, the average usage rate was 17,197 tests/lane, compared to 17,206 tests/lane in 2005.
top
of page
Volumes
By Test Type
The type of test a vehicle receives at the test station is usually determined by its model year. In 2006, the proportion of vehicles receiving an IM240 test decreased compared with 2004. This represents a reversal in the gradual trend towards greater OBD testing. Over time, IM240 tests will represent an increasingly small proportion of total tests. Due to continued fleet turnover, OBDII vehicles will comprise an increasingly large proportion of the testable fleet.
| Volumes
By Type |
2005 |
2006 |
| IM240
Tests |
258,149 |
252,000 |
| Idle
Tests |
6,858 |
7,399 |
| OBDII
Tests |
404,620 |
41,4467 |
| Gas
Cap Tests |
614,719 |
626,587 |
top
of page
Customer
Convenience
Customer convenience is a program priority. The amount of time motorists wait for vehicle testing is a key measure of convenience because it directly affects their acceptance of the program. The vehicle inspection program has developed procedures to ensure that customer wait times are minimized.
On average, customers waited slightly over 5 1/2 minutes for a test in 2005 and 2006 While there are many factors that affect waiting times, it is felt that the increase of OBDII testing for newer vehicles reduced testing volume and improved testing efficiencies were the contributing factors to these low wait times.
top
of page
Failure Statistics
Overview
A small population of vehicles in southeastern Wisconsin produces most of the vehicle exhaust pollution – these are the so-called gross polluters. As vehicles are driven, problems can develop because of defective parts, improper maintenance or simply from deterioration due to age and usage. This helps explain why a vehicle can be relatively clean one year and become a gross polluter at the time of its next inspection. Since hydrocarbon, carbon monoxide and nitrogen oxides are invisible, a vehicle inspection is an effective method to ensure that a vehicle is not polluting excessively.
For the IM240 and Idle emission inspection test types, emission limitations are simply the emission standards used to determine whether a vehicle passes or fails the emission inspection. The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (DNR) determines the emission standards necessary to achieve the emission reductions needed to attain air quality standards in the most cost effective manner. The emission limitations allow at least double the emission levels that vehicles should achieve if properly tuned and maintained. This helps ensure that a relatively well-maintained vehicle should be able to pass the emission test.
| |
2005 |
2006 |
Volume - All Test Types (pass/fail only) |
676,716 |
682,701 |
Initial Test Fail Rate – All Test Types |
10.5% |
10.2% |
Retest Fail Rate – All Test Types |
28.4% |
25.2% |
Overall Fail Rate |
12.3% |
11.63% |
Avg. Repair Cost for 1st Retest Pass |
$276.00 |
$282.45 |
IM240 Test Volume (pass/fail only) |
258,149 |
252,000 |
Initial IM240 Fail Rate |
14.2% |
12.6% |
Retest IM240 Fail Rate |
47.4% |
45.8% |
Overall IM240 Fail Rate |
18.7% |
16.5% |
Avg. Repair Costs for 1st Retest Pass |
$295.05 |
$300.11 |
Idle Test Volume (pass/fail only) |
6,858 |
7,399 |
Initial Idle Fail Rate |
10.7% |
10.1% |
Retest Idle Fail Rate |
38.8% |
43.3% |
Overall Idle Fail Rate |
13.4% |
13.2% |
Avg. Repair Costs for 1st Retest Pass |
$319.41 |
$264.35 |
OBD Test Volume (pass/fail only) |
404,620 |
415,467 |
Initial OBD Fail Rate |
6.5% |
6.9% |
Retest OBD Fail Rate |
7.0% |
7.0% |
Overall OBD Fail Rate |
6.5% |
6.9% |
Avg. Repair Costs for 1st Retest Pass |
$289.46 . |
$266.26 |
Gas Cap Test Volume (pass/fail only) |
614,719 |
626,587 |
Gas Cap Fail Rate Overall |
3.0% |
3.2% |
Vehicle Waivers |
1,173 |
857 |
The following chart is a summary of the failure rates for: 1) All Test Types; 2) IM240; 3) Idle; 4) OBDII and 5) Gas Caps. It also lists the associated repair costs for each test type. The average repair costs are for repairs performed at a repair facility between the initial test failure and subsequent retest pass.
The overall failure rate for all test types fell from 12.3% in 2005 to 11.6% in 2006. The drop in the failure rate can be attributed to a number of factors including more effective repairs and the fact that newer vehicles generally are more durable than older ones.
top
of page
Tailpipe
Tests - IM240 and Idle
IM240
Tests
The overall IM240 failure rate decreased slightly in 2005, from 18.7% % in 2005 to 16.5% in 2006 |
 |
Idle
Tests
In 2005, the initial failure rate was 10.7% and in 2006 the initial test failure rate was 10.1%. The retest failure rate was 38.8% in 2005, compared to 43.3 % in 2006. The overall idle test failure rate fell from 13.4% in 2005 to 13.2% in 2006.
|
 |
OBDII
Tests
The failure rate for initial OBDII tests rose from 6.5% in 2005 to 6.9% in 2006. The retest failure rate remained at 7% for both years. The overall OBDII failure rate rose from 6.5% in 2005 to 6.9% in 2006.
|
| |